| 1 |
On 03/23/2015 01:22 PM, Tim Harder wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hey all, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Having been around for a few years I've inherited or added quite a few |
| 5 |
> pkgs to the tree that I wouldn't mind other people fixing/bumping/etc |
| 6 |
> that don't fall into any current herds. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> With that in mind, I think it would be an interesting experiment if we |
| 9 |
> had a collaborative herd (probably named "collab") that signals the |
| 10 |
> status that anyone is generally free to fix, bump, or do sane things to |
| 11 |
> the pkgs with the caveat that you fix what you break. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Anyone else interested in such a setup? |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
It's not semantically correct, but it might be the easiest way to |
| 17 |
actually get this working with a minimum of changes. I guess what you |
| 18 |
really want is for the package to be maintainer-needed, but for you to |
| 19 |
be CCed on bugs? That would require metadata.xml and probably tool |
| 20 |
changes though. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
However we wind up doing it, most of my packages would fall into this |
| 23 |
category so I support the idea. |
Archives