| 1 |
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote: |
| 4 |
>> Sure, this packages work just fine thanks to the "/usr/X11R6 -> |
| 5 |
>> ../usr" symlink, so there is no real issue with that. But i was |
| 6 |
>> wondering whether the long term goal is to get ride of this |
| 7 |
>> symlink, and if so, whether it was time to start reporting/fixing |
| 8 |
>> them. In short, would enhancement bugreports about them be ok or |
| 9 |
>> invalid? |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> In my view, they would be great. Unfortunately I don't maintain |
| 12 |
> everything that installs to /usr/X11R6. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Some maintainers may not particularly care about this, so supplying |
| 15 |
> patches with your bugs could help. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I'm going to say, "patches with your bugs are required". We don't need a |
| 18 |
bunch of bugs about this since it's pretty obvious when packages install |
| 19 |
things there. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Michael Sterrett |
| 22 |
-Mr. Bones.- |
| 23 |
mr_bones_@g.o |
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives