| 1 |
On 3/12/06, R Hill <dirtyepic.sk@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> i think a 'status' tag might also be handy to indicate if the package has an |
| 3 |
> active upstream or not. either a text field or a predetermined set of |
| 4 |
> possibilities ("active"/"inactive"). |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
active/inactive sounds good enough for me, as long as people don't |
| 7 |
start tagging upstream as inactive if they do not reply within the |
| 8 |
hour... |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> multiple maintainer tags allowed? |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Sure, why not? That is how it is done with Gentoo maintainers in |
| 13 |
metadata.xml already, AFAIK. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Cheers |
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Marcelo Góes |
| 18 |
marcelogoes@×××××.com |
| 19 |
vanquirius@g.o |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives