Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o>
To: Ciaran McCreesh <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: Re[2]: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-editors/gnotepad+
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 23:18:56
Message-Id: 569226770.20060217001442@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-editors/gnotepad+ by Ciaran McCreesh
1 16.2.2006, 23:58:41, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
2
3 > On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 23:45:45 +0100 Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o> wrote:
4 > | OMG, stop this crap and don't waste our time. You specifically asked
5 > | me to do it - http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20201#c11
6
7 > No, I asked you to do it properly, not to send out one last rites email
8 > for something you're not going to remove.
9
10 What are you talking about? commonbox is listed as maintainer of that stuff,
11 it's been broken for years, you neither fixed it or bothered to remove it
12 from portage, nor did you at least re-assign that to maintainer-needed and
13 remove yourself from metadata.xml.
14
15 You asked me to send last rites, I did, noone cares about that stuff - so
16 will you finally punt the broken thing, instead of this pointless trolling??
17 Or should I CC QA on that bug, so that someone else will do it if you don't
18 want to?
19
20 > | Also, there wasn't exactly any flamefest so I don't know what you are
21 > | referring to above. You sent out a mail and noone gave a damn about
22 > | that stuff, should have been removed from from the tree 1 1/2 year
23 > | ago.
24
25 > Try looking harder next time.
26
27 That's exactly the link you provided in
28 http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20201#c7 so why on earth should I try
29 to look harder?
30
31
32 --
33
34 jakub

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-editors/gnotepad+ Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@g.o>