| 1 |
On 03/25/2010 11:01 PM, linux@×××××××××××××××.de wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hello, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> I wanted to report that cinepaint (which as of today is not in |
| 5 |
> portage) compiles fine on my gentoo box which has been emerge-synced |
| 6 |
> only yesterday. It uses however not the fltk-2.0 which is emerged by |
| 7 |
> default but the version fltk-1.1.10. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> On the fltk website they say however that actually 1.1 is the stable |
| 10 |
> version, whereas fltk-2.0 is an experimental version which is not as |
| 11 |
> much maintained as 1.1. By the way, 1.3 is the development version. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> In case anybody would like to take care of this, I won't be able to do |
| 14 |
> so during the next few weeks. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Regards, |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Gabriel |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> P.S.: I actually only tested the latest cvs version. I will test the |
| 21 |
> latest stable tarball and then see whether cinepaint is fully |
| 22 |
> functional, and will report back any problems I might encounter. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
http://bugs.gentoo.org/278375 is for cinepaint, not the mailinglist, but |
| 27 |
thanks anyway. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
- samuli |
Archives