Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: xmw@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-libs/glibc: glibc-2.14.1-r2.ebuild glibc-2.12.2.ebuild glibc-9999.ebuild glibc-2.15.ebuild glibc-2.10.1-r1.ebuild glibc-2.14.1-r1.ebuild glibc-2.14.ebuild glibc-2.13-r2.ebuild ChangeLog glibc-2.13-r4.ebuild glibc-2.11.3.ebuild glibc-2.9_p20081201-r3.ebuild glibc-2.12.1-r3.ebuild glibc-2.14.1.ebuild
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 09:32:20
Message-Id: 20120119103246.1d984ed4@pomiocik.lan
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-libs/glibc: glibc-2.14.1-r2.ebuild glibc-2.12.2.ebuild glibc-9999.ebuild glibc-2.15.ebuild glibc-2.10.1-r1.ebuild glibc-2.14.1-r1.ebuild glibc-2.14.ebuild glibc-2.13-r2.ebuild ChangeLog glibc-2.13-r4.ebuild glibc-2.11.3.ebuild glibc-2.9_p20081201-r3.ebuild glibc-2.12.1-r3.ebuild glibc-2.14.1.ebuild by Michael Weber
1 On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 03:42:14 +0100
2 Michael Weber <xmw@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > Um, what happend to the policy to not f*** around with stable ebuilds?
5
6 I don't think such a rule has any meaning considering that those
7 ebuilds are mostly contained in an eclass.
8
9 --
10 Best regards,
11 Michał Górny

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies