Re: [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates

[Matt Turner]

> honestly this list is such a tinderbox that I hardly read it. I actually
> missed the email at first and had to go back in the thread when I saw a
> lot of responses. Hence, I would prefer to get bugs than random emails
> that I have to search through.

So ignore it and he'll open bugs just the same. This was just an early
opportunity for people to say "no, this shouldn't be stabilized."