Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] rejecting unsigned commits
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 22:00:54
Message-Id: AANLkTi=4o69ytUxAVpy-O31AWQv-5p4bEWD2466NWYGx@mail.gmail.com
1 is there any reason we should allow people to commit unsigned
2 Manifest's anymore ? generating/posting/enabling a gpg key is
3 ridiculously easy and there's really no excuse for a dev to not have
4 done this already.
5
6 when i look at the tree, the signed stats are stupid low:
7 $ find *-* -maxdepth 2 -name Manifest | wc -l
8 14438
9 $ find *-* -maxdepth 2 -name Manifest -exec grep -l 'BEGIN PGP
10 SIGNATURE' {} + | wc -l
11 6032
12
13 this is especially important for the people doing arch keywording
14 since they make a ton of commits. i'm looking at you armin76.
15 -mike

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] rejecting unsigned commits Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] rejecting unsigned commits "Olivier Crête" <tester@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] rejecting unsigned commits "Petteri Räty" <betelgeuse@g.o>
[gentoo-dev] Re: rejecting unsigned commits Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] rejecting unsigned commits Mike Gilbert <floppymaster@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-dev] rejecting unsigned commits "Rémi Cardona" <remi@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] rejecting unsigned commits Jeroen Roovers <jer@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] rejecting unsigned commits Peter Volkov <pva@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] rejecting unsigned commits "Paweł Hajdan
[gentoo-dev] Re: rejecting unsigned commits Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] rejecting unsigned commits Jeremy Olexa <darkside@g.o>