| 1 |
Wulf C. Krueger wrote: |
| 2 |
> KDE4 will make use of cmake-utils.eclass we wrote because |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Why call it cmake-utils? |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> - we need use_enable- and use_with-like functions for cmake (makes ebuilds |
| 7 |
> easier to read) |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Could be done. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> - in-source and out-of-source build support |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Got it too :) |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> - we need LIB_SUFFIX support |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Could be added easily. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
> - our KDE4 eclasses rely on it. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Not in tree yet. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
> You might want to take a look at it. It's in the tree. I don't really |
| 24 |
> think we need two implementations. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
I think so too. I've got few suggestions: |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
* in cmake-utils_src_make(): |
| 29 |
emake ${@} - it would allow something like this: |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
cmake-utils_src_make -j1 |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
* if you `cd' into build directory - *please* return to ${S} -> use pushd/popd. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Last thing: please reply to gentoo-dev too :) |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
Krzysiek Pawlik <nelchael at gentoo.org> key id: 0xBC555551 |
| 39 |
desktop-misc, desktop-dock, x86, java, apache, ppc... |
Archives