1 |
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 11:12:54AM -0400, Matthew Vaughn wrote: |
2 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
3 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
4 |
> |
5 |
> In 2.6.0-test4-mm5, when CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG=y, this happens: |
6 |
> |
7 |
> root@omega linux-beta # make && make modules_install |
8 |
> make[1]: `arch/i386/kernel/asm-offsets.s' is up to date. |
9 |
> ~ CHK include/linux/compile.h |
10 |
> ~ CC drivers/acpi/pci_link.o |
11 |
> drivers/acpi/pci_link.c: In function `acpi_pci_link_try_get_current': |
12 |
> drivers/acpi/pci_link.c:290: `_dbg' undeclared (first use in this function) |
13 |
> drivers/acpi/pci_link.c:290: (Each undeclared identifier is reported |
14 |
> only once |
15 |
> drivers/acpi/pci_link.c:290: for each function it appears in.) |
16 |
> make[2]: *** [drivers/acpi/pci_link.o] Error 1 |
17 |
> make[1]: *** [drivers/acpi] Error 2 |
18 |
> make: *** [drivers] Error 2 |
19 |
> |
20 |
> Is this a known bug? If not, to whom should I report it? |
21 |
|
22 |
check out: http://lkml.org/lkml/2003/9/3/480 |
23 |
|
24 |
if you're gonna test mm-, development-, etc, i recommend highly that you |
25 |
haunt one of the LKML achives first looking for fixes.. most ones like |
26 |
this are picked up and reported quickly there. (part of the reason we |
27 |
don't officially support these kernels, moving target and all). |
28 |
|
29 |
|
30 |
-pete |
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
Peter Johanson |
34 |
<latexer@g.o> |
35 |
|
36 |
-- |
37 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |