Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Spider <spider@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Freetype 2.1.2 test results
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2002 16:46:28
Message-Id: 20020727234326.03f2f27b.spider@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Freetype 2.1.2 test results by Martin Schlemmer
1 begin quote
2 On 27 Jul 2002 21:59:56 +0200
3 Martin Schlemmer <azarah@g.o> wrote:
4
5 > >
6 >
7 > See if nautilus-1.0 works fine. It did not with freetype-2.1.0.
8 >
9
10
11 Some dep changes, and I had to hack fam .la file as it associated with
12 /usr/lib/libstdc++.la, something that doesn't exist in my system (I have
13 to reemerge fam and see if it still borks)
14
15 but nautilus 1.0.x works okay here
16
17 //Spider
18
19
20
21 --
22 begin .signature
23 This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature!
24 See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information.
25 end