| 1 |
Marius Mauch <genone@g.o> said: |
| 2 |
> Grant Goodyear schrieb: |
| 3 |
> >Some questions that need to be answered: |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> >* Can the repo be converted while maintaining the history? |
| 6 |
> >* How long does a full checkout take? |
| 7 |
> >* How much disk space does a full checkout require? |
| 8 |
> >* Is there a viewcvs equivalent available? |
| 9 |
> >* Others that I can't think of right now? (Please feel free to add.) |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Right now portage and repoman have no support for using anything but cvs |
| 12 |
> or rsync for the tree, e.g. repoman commit wouldn't work. Not hard to |
| 13 |
> fix, but something to keep in mind. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Rsync could still be used to deliver up-to-date tree's to people. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Changing the process would of course require backend changes to our |
| 18 |
utilities. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
The quesion is what is best for the job, and then implement it. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-Ryan |
Archives