Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o>
To: gentoo-core@××××××××××××.org
Cc: gentoo-dev@××××××××××××.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] eclass caching fix. was More unhappy news for overlay-utilizing devs :(
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 04:03:43
Message-Id: 421AAE8D.2040700@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] eclass caching fix. was More unhappy news for overlay-utilizing devs :( by Brian Harring
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Brian Harring wrote:
5 > So... stepping off the stool and getting back technical stuff, a fix is available at
6 > http://dev.gentoo.org/~ferringb/eclass-validation-fix.patch
7 > It's also InCvs.
8 >
9 > Devs should use this patch... won't break anything either, so no excuse in not using it :)
10
11 If we should use it, it would be helpful if we didn't have to keep track
12 of where it was (i.e., apply it to released portage as a patch).
13 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
14 Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
15
16 iD8DBQFCGq6NXVaO67S1rtsRAiQdAJ9x/iWqaEy+mq8LxXm6JF9U7wjKPACcDqDb
17 I5KZJLTT/KtSBVmMl7gfRFU=
18 =aHni
19 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
20 --
21 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies