| 1 |
On 09/12/14 17:34, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> I'm all for keeping it simple. However, backwards compatibility makes |
| 4 |
> it hard to keep things simple. I'd love to do, say, metadata.yml |
| 5 |
> supporting stuff like: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> - maintainer: foo@g.o, bar@g.o |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> - maintainer: |
| 10 |
> - name: Foo Bar |
| 11 |
> email: foo@g.o |
| 12 |
> - bar@g.o |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> (pseudo-code, not sure if it's 100% valid YAML) |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Would be neat though. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Back to the discussion would be nice to have just project@g.o |
| 20 |
instead of complex mappings. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
lu |
Archives