Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: rindeal <dev.rindeal@×××××.com>
Cc: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] flag-o-matic.eclass: bugfix for get-flag()
Date: Sun, 15 May 2016 19:41:57
Message-Id: 20160515214141.4dcc36f5.mgorny@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] flag-o-matic.eclass: bugfix for get-flag() by rindeal
1 On Sun, 15 May 2016 21:35:41 +0200
2 rindeal <dev.rindeal@×××××.com> wrote:
3
4 > > Dnia 15 maja 2016 15:31:29 CEST, Jan Chren <dev.rindeal@×××××.com> napisał(a):
5 > >>+ local f="${!i}"
6 > >>+ if [ "${f#-${findflag#-}}" != "${f}" ] ; then
7 > >
8 > > I know the original code sucked as well but could you replace this with more readable [[ ${f} == -${findflag#-}* ]] or alike (note: not tested).
9 >
10 > This is just as buggy as my original implementation, I've reworked it
11 > and thanks to the tests I hope it's now correct.
12
13 It is still unreadable. The point is, we use bash here, so please use
14 bash features (i.e. == with wildcards) to do comparison rather than
15 limited shell-style stripping of variables.
16
17 > >>+ printf "%s\n" "${f#-${findflag}=}"
18 > >
19 > > It may be a good idea to add a short explanation why you can't use echo here, as a comment.
20 >
21 > I've just copied what was there before, `echo` in bash is notoriously
22 > wild, but with this simple string I guess it's ok, so done.
23
24 I meant you should add a comment that you can't use echo because flags
25 like '-n' or '-e' would confuse it :-P.
26
27 --
28 Best regards,
29 Michał Górny
30 <http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/>

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] flag-o-matic.eclass: bugfix for get-flag() rindeal <dev.rindeal@×××××.com>