| 1 |
On Sunday 25 March 2007, Michael Krelin wrote: |
| 2 |
> > the werent the same question nor were they the same answer |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> They weren't the same, but the second answer was definitely wrong: |
| 5 |
> > > So is alternative package manager support something that's considered |
| 6 |
> > > important and a priority by the Council? |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > yes |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > > Did you not say that finding alternatives to Portage is one of Gentoo's |
| 11 |
> > > |
| 12 |
> > > > priorities? |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > no i did not, nor does that apply here |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> because it explicitly states that you *did not* say it (and the wording |
| 17 |
> doesn't differ enough to justify it), not only that it doesn't apply. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
i think the use of negatives has confused you ... the answers i posted to |
| 20 |
ciaranm's questions in both cases are correct |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
one of Gentoo's priorities is to enable alternative package managers to |
| 23 |
coexist sanely ... it is not one of Gentoo's priorities at this time to |
| 24 |
replace Portage with a different package manager |
| 25 |
-mike |
Archives