1 |
@mgorny may be able to help with some of this and has quite a bit of |
2 |
experience building clang/llvm. Where I work we use a "wrapper" that |
3 |
helps coordinate a lot of the moving pieces. |
4 |
|
5 |
https://github.com/pathscale/llvm-suite/ |
6 |
|
7 |
This may not be the perfect "gentoo" way to handle it, but the |
8 |
approach would produce a clean and correct compiler. With llvm |
9 |
dependencies getting more and more complicated, I'm not sure if it |
10 |
would be possible to have both a gnu-free and also perfect |
11 |
1-project-source-repo:1-ebuild ratio. |
12 |
|
13 |
I'm sure there's llvm/clang ebuilds already and curious what others think.. |
14 |
|
15 |
|
16 |
|
17 |
On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 9:48 PM, Ian Bloss <ianlinkcd@×××××.com> wrote: |
18 |
> Woot! Don't tell Stallman lol. |
19 |
> |
20 |
> |
21 |
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016, 09:22 Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
22 |
>> |
23 |
>> Hello, everyone. |
24 |
>> |
25 |
>> I have the pleasure of announcing that after the long period of split |
26 |
>> maintenance, we are forming an united LLVM project [1] to maintain all |
27 |
>> of LLVM packages in Gentoo and work on establishing improved support for |
28 |
>> a healthy, gcc-free ecosystem. |
29 |
>> |
30 |
>> [1]:https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:LLVM |
31 |
>> |
32 |
>> -- |
33 |
>> Best regards, |
34 |
>> Michał Górny |
35 |
>> <http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/> |