| 1 |
On 04/12/2010 02:20 AM, Ryan Hill wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 00:13:41 +0200 |
| 3 |
> Christian Faulhammer <fauli@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@g.o>: |
| 6 |
>>> I don't think later is valid resolution. If there's a valid bug it |
| 7 |
>>> just means it's never looked at again. If the bug is not valid then a |
| 8 |
>>> different resolution should be used. So what do you think about |
| 9 |
>>> disabling later? I would like to avoid things like this: |
| 10 |
>>> |
| 11 |
>>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113121#c21 |
| 12 |
>>> |
| 13 |
>>> Not applicable to the bug above but in general our social contract |
| 14 |
>>> says: "We will not hide problems" |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
>> Kill REMIND and LATER, introduce Later keyword or ASSIGNED LATER. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> "Me too."© |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> What happens to bugs already in that state though? |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
I would imagine they could be kept in the db as it is but just remove |
| 25 |
the options from the UI. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Regards, |
| 28 |
Petteri |
Archives