Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: dilfridge@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rejecting unsigned commits
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2011 14:33:11
Message-Id: 20110325153031.4b00d583@pomiocik.lan
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rejecting unsigned commits by "Andreas K. Huettel"
1 On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 09:53:01 +0100
2 "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > Of course now we can add additional requirements:
5 >
6 > * The key must have an userid that refers to an official Gentoo
7 > e-mail address. E.g. dilfridge@g.o
8
9 I think this is pretty useless assuming we're already wanting
10 to limit the amount of keys trusted to a specific list.
11
12 > * The userid should have some specific "default string" in its
13 > comment field, like "Gentoo manifest signing key".
14
15 What's the point of this? I don't see a reason to enforce a dev to have
16 a dedicated Manifest signing key, and even more I don't see a reason to
17 add such comments to normal keys.
18
19 --
20 Best regards,
21 Michał Górny

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rejecting unsigned commits "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o>