1 |
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 2:34 AM, Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
3 |
> Hash: SHA256 |
4 |
> |
5 |
> On 13/06/13 01:05 AM, Michał Górny wrote: |
6 |
>> Dnia 2013-06-13, o godz. 09:35:54 "Dennis Lan (dlan)" |
7 |
>> <dennis.yxun@×××××.com> napisał(a): |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>>> also 4) app-admin/conserver 5) net-nds/ypbind 6) net-fs/samba 7) |
10 |
>>> net-analyzer/scli 8) net-analyzer/traceproto 6) net-misc/siproxd |
11 |
>>> |
12 |
>>> use dmalloc but controlled under USE=debug |
13 |
>> |
14 |
>> Do those use USE=debug solely for dmalloc or does it imply other |
15 |
>> stuff? Therefore: will it be possible to use USE=dmalloc in those |
16 |
>> packages? |
17 |
|
18 |
HI mgorny, as I look into those ebuilds |
19 |
all of them use the USE=debug flag for dmalloc only, not for other |
20 |
debugging control |
21 |
so, as your second question, of course it's possible to switch to USE=dmalloc |
22 |
|
23 |
>> |
24 |
> |
25 |
> and to follow up, if we assume that USE="debug" does more than just |
26 |
> build the package against the dmalloc lib (which is likely), is there |
27 |
|
28 |
Yes, if this case exist.. then the separation would be good |
29 |
|
30 |
|
31 |
> any particular benefit to USE="debug -dmalloc" ? Or USE="dmalloc |
32 |
> - -debug" ? |
33 |
> |
34 |
|
35 |
I'm not sure, probably the befefits would be that we can have more |
36 |
accurate/explicit control, |
37 |
USE="dmalloc" is for debugging memory usage stuff (allocation, free, |
38 |
fence-post overwritten control) |
39 |
and USE=debug for other stuff? |
40 |
|
41 |
This is a slightly improvement, but I'm also totally fine to keep |
42 |
current state as it is.. no big deal |
43 |
|
44 |
> |
45 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
46 |
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) |
47 |
> |
48 |
> iF4EAREIAAYFAlHDSyEACgkQ2ugaI38ACPAHUwEAqFFDyarLSE8I/k8eKBUibmxu |
49 |
> qZT2pnaaMj3nPEqrFxYBAIsIP8HAHR5mIaLBHKPiR6/oI/cxcu3h1XFodpbERO4t |
50 |
> =T2KX |
51 |
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
52 |
> |