| 1 |
On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 17:56:38 -0400 |
| 2 |
Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Wednesday, June 02, 2010 09:17:00 Michał Górny wrote: |
| 5 |
> > On Wed, 2 Jun 2010 03:16:12 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 6 |
> > > use emake then and leverage make's implicit rules. |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > The implicit make rules are less universal and -- in the fact -- |
| 9 |
> > pretty poor. They're strictly make-dependant, which reduces the |
| 10 |
> > amount of control over their behavior. In my opinion, if we should |
| 11 |
> > ever use such behavior, it should be rather technical |
| 12 |
> > implementation of the functions I'm proposing instead of inline use. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> ebuilds requires GNU make which means the implicit rules are |
| 15 |
> "universal". not that i really know what you're talking about. the |
| 16 |
> rules are also clearly documented and support all the proper flags we |
| 17 |
> currently support. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Ok, if we can surely assume 'emake' will always call GNU Make, then I |
| 20 |
agree with your solution and withdraw my ideas. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Best regards, |
| 24 |
Michał Górny |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
<http://mgorny.alt.pl> |
| 27 |
<xmpp:mgorny@××××××.ru> |
Archives