| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Andrew Muraco wrote: |
| 5 |
| Another thing that I don't like, is the feel of this method does seem |
| 6 |
| "offical" enough.. mostly because portage is not 'stable'-aware, Its |
| 7 |
| just using a stripped down tree. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
What do you want then? If an entire standalone tree distributed by |
| 10 |
Gentoo doesn't feel official enough, what will? |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Thanks, |
| 13 |
Donnie |
| 14 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 15 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
iD8DBQFDwSWAXVaO67S1rtsRAo7rAJ9YAf+Z3UUsshKfURP71lKqL5PjLwCdGcem |
| 18 |
czZJv0hCE0XbT9pjjZOtaiY= |
| 19 |
=GdT8 |
| 20 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives