Archives
Archives
| From: | Ryan Phillips <rphillips@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Cc: | Ryan Phillips <rphillips@g.o>, agriffis@g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay support current proposal? | ||
| Date: | Mon, 27 Mar 2006 05:47:06 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20060327054353.GA9018@trolocsis.dyndns.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay support current proposal? by Aron Griffis |
||
| 1 | Aron Griffis <agriffis@g.o> said: |
| 2 | > Have you followed the threads in the past regarding using other |
| 3 | > version control systems for portage? Some devs have done benchmarks |
| 4 | > and found that there are blocking issues with subversion, particularly |
| 5 | > because of its repo-wide revisions that prevent multiple commits from |
| 6 | > happening simultaneously. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | In actuality, Subversion does 98% of the commit in an initial |
| 9 | transaction, and the blocking only occurs in the last 2% with the FSFS |
| 10 | filesystem. It really isn't an issue and shouldn't prevent us from |
| 11 | adopting it. |
| 12 | |
| 13 | -ryan |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay support current proposal? | Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] overlay support current proposal? | Chris Bainbridge <chris.bainbridge@×××××.com> |