Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: m h <sesquile@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Making the developer community more open
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 00:54:56
Message-Id: e36b84ee0603201652w38d93a35i376a38ce921e89fb@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Making the developer community more open by George Shapovalov
1 George-
2 Not sure if you have seen this or not. Check out Conary [1] from
3 rPath. Think of it as Rpm+Ebuild+Distributed. It's done by some
4 people who used to be at Redhat and in one of the whitepapers, they
5 specifically mention portage/ebuild.
6
7 -matt
8
9 1 - http://wiki.conary.com/FrontPage
10
11 On 3/20/06, George Shapovalov <george@g.o> wrote:
12 > A quick update.
13 >
14 > Please use this link for the proposal instead of the one listed in original
15 > post in the bug:
16 > http://dev.gentoo.org/~george/epsp/proposal.html
17 >
18 > The files have been migrated to my gentoo space, as proper. I just added
19 > comment to the bug and I'll put up some remonder at the place the original
20 > link points to (but I am no longer at that place, so I cannot predict for how
21 > long that will work..)
22 >
23 > > Please take a look at #1523 (note the number ;)), it addresses essentially
24 > George
25 > --
26 > gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list
27 >
28 >
29
30 --
31 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list