| 1 |
On 4/2/06, Carsten Lohrke <carlo@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> This is not the case. At least unless the user actively looks at package.mask. |
| 3 |
> Since Portage doesn't provide the information, this point is void. And even |
| 4 |
> if - four weeks are a too long, imho. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
I still do not understand what the rush is with removing a package. |
| 7 |
Readding a package if necessary will be much more troublesome than |
| 8 |
just keeping it masked for a month. I believe this is the general |
| 9 |
consensus on the subject. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Marcelo |
| 12 |
-- |
| 13 |
Marcelo Góes |
| 14 |
marcelogoes@×××××.com |
| 15 |
vanquirius@g.o |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives