| 1 |
On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 11:59:33AM -0500, Michael Cummings wrote: |
| 2 |
> Not sure about the implimentation of a stable:arch, |
| 3 |
> though I'm sure carpaski and team is loath to having a new |
| 4 |
> field added as an alternative (stable:true/false?). |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Wouldn't it make more sense to keep it as a seperate tree, distributed |
| 7 |
on seperate servers? This would take care of issues such as: |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
* only allowing Gentoo Stable users (ie ones who have coughed up) |
| 10 |
to access it; |
| 11 |
* not requiring contributing users (ie ones who have paypalled us |
| 12 |
money) to support paying users; |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-- |
| 15 |
When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him. - Jonathan Swift |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives