Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Patrick Lauer <gentoo@×××××××××××××.de>
To: Zack Gilburd <klasikahl@g.o>
Cc: vapier@g.o, gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] lsh (and liboop) on Gentoo
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 15:43:10
Message-Id: 1063986188.11590.8.camel@localhost
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] lsh (and liboop) on Gentoo by Zack Gilburd
1 On Wed, 2003-09-17 at 07:09, Zack Gilburd wrote:
2 > On Tuesday 16 September 2003 06:32 pm, Mike Frysinger wrote:
3 > > with all this openssh crap thats been happening today, i was wondering if
4 > > anyone made ebuilds for lsh (and thus liboop) for Gentoo ... i was looking
5 > > at liboop and they use the autotools pretty poorly imho ...
6 >
7 > AFAIK, lsh is not secure, whatsoever.
8 You're right, lsh has the same type of error as ssh.
9 (possible root compromise)
10
11 http://lists.lysator.liu.se/pipermail/lsh-bugs/2003q3/000120.html
12
13 so at the moment securing a networked linux box is a bit of russian
14 roulette ...
15
16 I already posted a comment to bug 28971 (lsh ebuild)
17
18
19
20
21 --
22 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list