Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Pat Double <double@×××××××××.com>
To: Nick Jones <carpaski@××××××.net>, Max Kalika <max+lists.gentoo-dev@×××××××××.edu>
Cc: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] portage-2.0.47-r6 and distcc
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 11:48:44
Message-Id: 200302280536.22012.double@inebraska.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] portage-2.0.47-r6 and distcc by Nick Jones
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Perhaps I am mistaken. In previous versions of portage that supported distcc,
5 I would find the compiler command reported in ./configure as "distcc gcc". Is
6 this the case with portage-2.0.47-r7? Or is it done through the path somehow?
7 I noticed that I have been getting hangs in compiling this morning (I thought
8 maybe due to the new glibc), so I tried setting MAKEOPTS="-j1" and the
9 problem when away. Not satisified it is glibc, I removed "distcc" as a
10 FEATURE and the problem is gone.
11
12 On Friday 28 February 2003 01:51 am, Nick Jones wrote:
13 > > Seems like the distcc feature stopped working since I upgraded to the
14 > > latest portage. Can anyone confirm?
15 > >
16 > > gcc is being called directly from the installed path instead of the
17 > > wrapper directory generated by distcc. it looks like portage isn't
18 > > setting the PATH to include /usr/lib/distcc/bin as the first item. This
19 > > worked fine in portage-2.0.47-r3 but not -r5 or -r6.
20 >
21 > use >=portage-2.0.47-r7
22 >
23 > --
24 > gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list
25
26 - --
27 Pat Double, double@×××××××××.com
28 "In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth."
29 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
30 Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
31
32 iD8DBQE+X0m1dOmLNuoWoKgRAuYuAJsHUgWYdLWSha8z184XW5dvxnL8nwCgi3v4
33 0hq/Es9OhncZqDGrKWRlGP0=
34 =1Hgy
35 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
36
37
38 --
39 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] portage-2.0.47-r6 and distcc Max Kalika <max+lists.gentoo-dev@×××××××××.edu>