| 1 |
On Friday 19 May 2006 16:17, Roy Marples wrote: |
| 2 |
> I can show you bugs where existing packages have invalid init scripts that |
| 3 |
> just don't work with any baselayout version in portage. You could argue |
| 4 |
> that they shouldn't be in the tree - if so then our imap server is |
| 5 |
> foo-bared as it uses courier-imap. I suggest you check out bug #98745 for a |
| 6 |
> clear definition of "support". |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Bugs exist and should be fixed, but this is by no means an argument. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
> I can also show you Gentoo scripts used by ifplugd and netplug with init-ng |
| 11 |
> support in the tree right now. I guess that means that init-ng has some |
| 12 |
> level of support right? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
There will be always someone who goes ahead. Fact is that every dev who |
| 15 |
maintains a package installing an init script is expecteted to do so for |
| 16 |
baselayout, but is free to say no, when someone requests an initng one, as |
| 17 |
long as it isn't the Gentoo default. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Carsten |
Archives