From: | "Olivier CrĂȘte" <tester@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] /usr/libexec vs /usr/lib(32|64)/misc | ||
Date: | Tue, 29 Nov 2005 15:23:34 | ||
Message-Id: | 1133277485.7971.8.camel@TesterBox.tester.ca | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] /usr/libexec vs /usr/lib(32|64)/misc by Mike Frysinger |
1 | On Tue, 2005-29-11 at 14:53 +0000, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
2 | > On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 03:23:54PM +0100, Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten? wrote: |
3 | > > what's the official status of /usr/libexec directory? |
4 | > |
5 | > personally, i'd prefer if we moved all of /usr/libexec to /usr/lib/misc |
6 | |
7 | Why move the libexec content to libdir? They are all executables, not |
8 | libraries. Its in the same category as /usr/bin. |
9 | |
10 | -- |
11 | Olivier CrĂȘte |
12 | tester@g.o |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] /usr/libexec vs /usr/lib(32|64)/misc | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> |