Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Christina Fullam <musikc@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: RE: [gentoo-dev] ML changes
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 19:13:47
1 Darren kirby <bulliver@×××××××××××.org> wrote:
2 >And what exactly is the bloody point if all of the contributions from
3 >users are going to rot in some queue until they are no longer relevant?
5 I think everyone is overlooking the part included previously:
6 "An additional method discussed was to have all non-dev emails on a
7 timeout, pick a number of hours, and then the email if not moderated
8 would be released. (non-dev sends his email, time period expires and no
9 one booted it, so the email rolls through)"
11 This means that non-dev emails will still be sent to the list, just at a
12 delay. This same delay can and will be exercised against developers
13 if the developer demonstrates a justification for it.
14 This also means that non-dev input will be accepted and viewed as it
15 always has, the only change is that there is a delay.
17 Kind regards,
18 Christina Fullam
19 Gentoo Developer Relations Lead | GWN Author
21 --
22 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list


Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: ML changes Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o>