1 |
Norberto Bensa wrote: |
2 |
> Excuse me for thread hijack. |
3 |
> |
4 |
> Would it make sense to add (for example): |
5 |
> |
6 |
> kde-games |
7 |
> gnome-games |
8 |
> |
9 |
> ? |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Or the other way around. Move kde-base/kmail to mail-client/kmail ? |
12 |
> |
13 |
> What about both ways using symlinks: kde-games/ksudoku -> games-puzzle/ksudoku ? |
14 |
> |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Thanks, |
17 |
> Norberto |
18 |
> |
19 |
Personally I prefer all the "official" kde package in kde-base - it |
20 |
allows me to quickly know that this given package is part of the |
21 |
official KDE package set. |
22 |
|
23 |
I don't see a need for kde-games - it's pretty clear from the |
24 |
descriptions which of the kde-base packages are games, and for the |
25 |
reason stated above I don't like the idea of mixing "official" and |
26 |
"unofficial" packages. |
27 |
|
28 |
I suspect symlinks are likely to cause issues (what happens if you try |
29 |
to install both kde-games/ksudoku and games-puzzle/ksudoku?) and as far |
30 |
as I know are never used in the package tree. |
31 |
|
32 |
Package moves like this are occasionally going to happen, no matter how |
33 |
you structure the repository. The only real question here is whether |
34 |
this is a package move (in which case, I believe, portage goes through |
35 |
and updates /etc/portage/package.*, world and possibly custom sets |
36 |
contents automatically) or just a package mask (in which case it's up to |
37 |
the user to do all those updates) |
38 |
|
39 |
AllenJB |