1 |
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Jonathan Callen <jcallen@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> The *last* eclass inherited |
3 |
|
4 |
Well I'll be ferschnookered! |
5 |
|
6 |
Googling confirms this. I'm quite shocked. I have believed the |
7 |
opposite, for a very long time, with perfect confidence. No idea why |
8 |
I thought so -- in retrospect, I'm pretty sure I was aware that they |
9 |
were sourced in order -- so why would the phase function overrides act |
10 |
in an entirely opposite pattern? Some stupid aislexydic thinko, years |
11 |
ago, no doubt. Good catch, Julian! |
12 |
|
13 |
I'll fix it when I rev this patch series. |
14 |
|
15 |
-gmt |