Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Andrew Muraco <tuxp3@×××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January
Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2006 21:29:00
Message-Id: 43B99A5A.7080406@leetworks.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for January by Chandler Carruth
1 Chandler Carruth wrote:
2
3 > Lance Albertson wrote:
4 >
5 >> Yeah, maybe so :-)
6 >>
7 >> Reflecting on this more, I see that most of the council members are a
8 >> very important part of the active Gentoo development model (toolchain,
9 >> etc). They need to keep those roles active as much as possible, then
10 >> help on the council. I guess I view this person as a sole chairmen of
11 >> the board that just focuses on council type duties and roles. I think
12 >> the current council has lots of great people, but they're all busy with
13 >> their subprojects and can't take on a role like this. We really need a
14 >> single voice to bind everything together, but doesn't have total control
15 >> like Daniel did.
16 >>
17 >> Hopefully I'm making sense..
18 >
19 > As perhaps a good way of thinking of this, the common term used in
20 > commitees (as I have interacted with them in various beaurocratic
21 > situations) is a "non-voting chair". This person would organize,
22 > schedule, direct, communicate, and facilitate the work of the
23 > committee, to allow the voting members to more effectively handle the
24 > issues arising for the committee. The voting members need not take on
25 > much of a workload to vote and serve on the committee because most (if
26 > not all) of the time consuming tasks and aspects of the committee are
27 > handled by a non-voting chair. Simultaneously, the singular nature of
28 > the chair is less of a concern because they are non-voting. The lack
29 > of a vote checks their singular power, while still allowing them to
30 > very efficiently organize and direct information in and out of the
31 > committee. *shrug* I'm not entirely sure that I agree or disagree with
32 > this solution, but wanted to give an example of what (I think?) Lance
33 > is getting at here.
34
35 I'm not sure if this would apply, but in the US Government System, the
36 supreme courts are basicly a committee (or council, which ever word you
37 like better), the "leader" (Chief Justice) of the supreme court doesn't
38 have any extra power, but has extra duties, and has senority over the
39 other Justices. Perhaps a situation like that would the Gento Council,
40 or maybe it should stay in the Justice System.
41
42 wkr,
43 Andrew
44 --
45 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list