| 1 |
On 03/10/2018 01:42 PM, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
> W dniu sob, 10.03.2018 o godzinie 13∶22 -0800, użytkownik Zac Medico |
| 3 |
> napisał: |
| 4 |
>> Please review. This is needed in order to resolve |
| 5 |
>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/650072. |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> Title: Portage rsync tree verification unstable |
| 8 |
>> Author: Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> |
| 9 |
>> Posted: 2018-03-13 |
| 10 |
>> Revision: 1 |
| 11 |
>> News-Item-Format: 2.0 |
| 12 |
>> Display-If-Installed: sys-apps/portage |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
>> Starting with sys-apps/portage-2.3.24, Portage will no longer verify |
| 15 |
>> the Gentoo repository after rsync by default, which contradicts the |
| 16 |
>> earlier "Portage rsync tree verification" news item. |
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
>> If users wish to enable the 'rsync-verify' USE flag for sys-apps/portage, |
| 19 |
>> they need to follow these steps: |
| 20 |
>> |
| 21 |
>> 1) In order to unmask the 'rsync-verify' USE flag, create a file named |
| 22 |
>> /etc/portage/profile/package.use.mask containing a line like the |
| 23 |
>> following: |
| 24 |
>> |
| 25 |
>> sys-apps/portage -rsync-verify |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> Why do you need to mask it in the first place? The dependencies are |
| 28 |
> stable, and it's not like having it unmasked-but-off-by-default is going |
| 29 |
> to cause any major harm. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
It's only in packages.use.stable.mask, but it simplifies the |
| 32 |
instructions for users if we simply refer to package.use.mask here. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Since gemato doesn't have stable keywords yet, the |
| 35 |
packages.use.stable.mask is needed so that repoman will allow us |
| 36 |
stabilize the latest sys-apps/portage. |
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
Thanks, |
| 39 |
Zac |
Archives