Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o>
To: Martin Lesser <gentoo@××××××××××.de>
Cc: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] /etc/portage/package.unmask not working as expected
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 10:59:59
Message-Id: 20030925105956.GB20036@curie-int.orbis-terrarum.net
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] /etc/portage/package.unmask not working as expected by Martin Lesser
1 On Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 11:51:53AM +0200, Martin Lesser wrote:
2 > I use sys-libs/db-4.1.24.ebuild without problems and put it into my
3 > local ebuilds-tree where I marked it as stable (KEYWORDS="x86"). I also
4 > want to use db-4.1.X in SLOT="4" (instead of "4.1") for sys-libs/db so I
5 > don't have to play with the current 4.0.14-release. Additionally I put
6 > >=sys-libs/db-4.1.20
7 > into /etc/portage/package.unmask
8 I'd strongly advise against changing those SLOTs. There are some
9 packages that specificly want db-4.0 and others that want db-4.1.
10 The packages co-exist perfectly fine. I have them installed on several
11 servers for OpenLDAP 2.1 support.
12
13 sys-libs/db-4.1 is NOT masked in packages.mask, so putting it into
14 package.unmask is not the correct way of getting it released.
15
16 I have a copy in my local overlay that changes KEYWORDS to x86.
17
18 I do note that the behaviour has changed recently, I don't know why.
19
20 emerge -p '>=sys-libs/db-4.1*'
21 ...
22 !!! all ebuilds that could satisfy ">=sys-libs/db-4.1" have been masked.
23
24 Carpaski: did the behaviour of the masking change some?
25
26 --
27 Robin Hugh Johnson
28 E-Mail : robbat2@××××××××××××××.net
29 Home Page : http://www.orbis-terrarum.net/?l=people.robbat2
30 ICQ# : 30269588 or 41961639
31 GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85