1 |
On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 06:57 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
2 |
> as one of the new sane features of the next portage-2.1_pre release, we're |
3 |
> looking to cut out use.defaults support |
4 |
|
5 |
I see this as a good and bad thing. Good in one hand that less autojunk |
6 |
would be enabled like python/perl bindings not being added to every |
7 |
program on your system that supports it. Bad in the other hand I see |
8 |
the state of profiles getting worse=more bloated. The autouse itself is |
9 |
not a bad feature or idea if it were used properly. Problem is that |
10 |
it's not been used properly. If it were limited to simple things like |
11 |
just X and the things that actually make sense then it would even be |
12 |
fine to keep and would allow some of the more bloated (default-linux) |
13 |
profiles to be cleaned up. Shrug. I like the existing behavior and the |
14 |
power of deciding for myself when and where I want to take advantage of |
15 |
USE_ORDER= |
16 |
|
17 |
|
18 |
|
19 |
> existing stable users wont be affected as the 2.0.x versions will continue to |
20 |
> carry support for this, but some of you stable users may notice some USE |
21 |
> flags suddenly "disappearing" |
22 |
> |
23 |
> to recap, use.defaults inserts USE flags for you based upon what packages you |
24 |
> have installed when you havent declared a preference. for example, if you |
25 |
> have neither '-cups' or 'cups' in your USE (either in your make.conf, |
26 |
> profile, env, whatever), but you do have the net-print/cups package |
27 |
> installed, portage will add 'cups' to your USE |
28 |
> -mike |
29 |
-- |
30 |
solar <solar@g.o> |
31 |
Gentoo Linux |
32 |
|
33 |
-- |
34 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |