| 1 |
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 8:53 PM, Daniel Campbell <zlg@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> As you said, however, it's a choice of the maintainer. Things like Perl |
| 4 |
> and Python may be less prone to this issue since they're meant to be |
| 5 |
> portable. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
The concept is that the maintainer will only use this when this is the |
| 9 |
case. The goal is to cut down on stabilization burden esp for minor |
| 10 |
arches on stuff that should be arch independent. I don't think we |
| 11 |
formalized a ton of rules - maintainers should know when it is safe to |
| 12 |
use. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-- |
| 15 |
Rich |
Archives