| 1 |
On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 13:30:10 +0200 |
| 2 |
Agostino Sarubbo <ago@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On giovedì 22 aprile 2021 12:22:00 CEST Theo Anderson wrote: |
| 5 |
> > On the subject of many bugs, there are now almost 150 open bugs |
| 6 |
> > assigned to guru@g.o. With this has come quite an email |
| 7 |
> > avalanche for which I think people must have set up mail filters by |
| 8 |
> > now. I imagine this means that bugs will no longer get the same |
| 9 |
> > amount of attention as they used to. To increase the visibility do |
| 10 |
> > you think it would be a good idea to CC or assign the bugs to the |
| 11 |
> > specific package maintainers rather than guru@g.o? |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Hello Theo, |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> I'm fine to assign directly and/or cc'ing guru@. For now I'm |
| 16 |
> following the guidelines but it takes one second to change it. |
| 17 |
> Please discuss this internally and let me know if I have to change |
| 18 |
> the assignee. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Agostino |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Hi Agostino, |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
After some discussion in IRC we've agreed to have the maintainer of |
| 26 |
the respective packages be assigned to the bug with guru@g.o be CC'd. |
| 27 |
Where no maintainer exists for a package guru@g.o remains as the |
| 28 |
assignee. If you could make those changes that would be great (I |
| 29 |
suppose doing it retroactively would be a bit of a mission and is out |
| 30 |
of the question). |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Thanks |
Archives