| 1 |
On Thu, 10 Aug 2017 23:30:37 +0000 (UTC) |
| 2 |
Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Meanwhile, having buildpkg on virtual packages[1] is what amuses me. |
| 5 |
> There, most of the benefits of binpkgs that arguably apply even to |
| 6 |
> prebuilt binary and no-bin packages as long as they package and |
| 7 |
> install /some/ file, arguably don't apply at all, tho I suppose there |
| 8 |
> might be corner cases where they /could/. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
That is two other cases I did not think of, thanks for mentioning. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
- virtual ebuilds |
| 13 |
- meta ebuilds |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
binpkgs of those do not make much sense. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
William L. Thomson Jr. |
Archives