1 |
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 9:51 PM, David Leverton |
2 |
<levertond@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
> On Monday 28 December 2009 20:50:17 Fabio Erculiani wrote: |
4 |
>> What all this has to do with the fact that they are just build |
5 |
>> dependencies? Just wondering. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> They're not just build dependencies. They're required to use the library in a |
8 |
> certain way, namely to compile other programs against it. As long as we |
9 |
> don't have compile-against dependencies, the only correct way to express that |
10 |
> is RDEPEND (and also DEPEND because they're /also/ needed to build the |
11 |
> library itself). |
12 |
|
13 |
To me you are saying that DEPEND would work just fine. No? |
14 |
|
15 |
> |
16 |
> |
17 |
|
18 |
|
19 |
|
20 |
-- |
21 |
Fabio Erculiani |
22 |
http://www.sabayon.org |
23 |
http://www.gentoo.org |