Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Bryan D. Stine" <battousai@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GLEP 19 -- Gentoo Stable Portage Tree
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 19:28:11
Message-Id: 200402021326.07159.battousai@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GLEP 19 -- Gentoo Stable Portage Tree by Kurt Lieber
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Personally, I also disagree with charging for the tree as well. However, the
5 premium server access is something I'm more inclined to agree with, primarily
6 because of the performance benefits, further dissemination of load, and, best
7 of all, lack of favoritism. Good idea, Kurt.
8
9 On Monday February 2, 2004 12:26 pm, Kurt Lieber wrote:
10 > On Mon, Feb 02, 2004 at 10:45:11AM -0500 or thereabouts, Caleb Tennis wrote:
11 > > This is an awesome GLEP idea, and I'm glad it finally got put into
12 > > written words. The one suggestion I have, which I am sure is up for a
13 > > large amount of criticism, is that I think Gentoo should charge a fee for
14 > > the use of this tree. This is, in my opinion, a premium service, and a I
15 > > believe it should come with a premium price, even if it's as low as 5
16 > > dollars per quarter.
17 >
18 > I'll be interested to see what other folks say about that suggestion. I am
19 > personally opposed to it, but not for the same reasons that I think a lot
20 > of the other folks will be.
21 >
22 > I would hate to exclude certain key features of Gentoo Linux to those folks
23 > who can't/won't pay for them. I feel a stable tree is a key feature and
24 > charging for it would do more harm than good.
25 >
26 > A better idea might be to set up a number of private mirror servers and
27 > charge for access to them. Folks who wished to sign up for this service
28 > could get guaranteed access to files, better speeds because fewer people
29 > would be using the servers, etc. Updates would get pushed out to both
30 > types of servers (private and public) at the same time -- no favoratism
31 > would be shown. In other words, charge people for better performance,
32 > rather than additional features. That's the subject of an entirely
33 > different GLEP, however.
34
35 - --
36 Bryan D. Stine
37 <battousai@g.o>
38 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
39 Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
40
41 iD8DBQFAHpY9fOANI+KyU0sRAjutAJwOWOvrO5HQLC23343Bek4TZGQrvgCeLZSV
42 8u3iYBX91ktSVdsyJOJj/Dg=
43 =Fcyf
44 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
45
46 --
47 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list