Archives
Archives
| From: | Thomas de Grenier de Latour <degrenier@×××××××××××.fr> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] New Portage Category: dev-scheme | ||
| Date: | Mon, 26 Jan 2004 19:19:23 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20040126201931.339e5119@wallace.fasmz.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] New Portage Category: dev-scheme by Matthew Kennedy |
||
| 1 | On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 13:07:01 -0600 |
| 2 | Matthew Kennedy <mkennedy@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | > Yes, but dev-lisp is already chockers with common lisp stuff, so that |
| 6 | > won't do. |
| 7 | > |
| 8 | |
| 9 | What about a dev-commonlisp category then? Like there is app-emacs |
| 10 | (resp. app-vim) for emacs (resp. vim) packages, whereas other editors |
| 11 | goes to app-editors. |
| 12 | |
| 13 | -- |
| 14 | TGL. |
| 15 | |
| 16 | -- |
| 17 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] New Portage Category: dev-scheme | Blake Matheny <jake@g.o> |