1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
On 07/22/2013 12:33 AM, Michał Górny wrote: |
5 |
> Dnia 2013-07-22, o godz. 00:16:31 hasufell <hasufell@g.o> |
6 |
> napisał(a): |
7 |
> |
8 |
>> On 07/22/2013 12:07 AM, Duncan wrote: |
9 |
>>> hasufell posted on Sun, 21 Jul 2013 17:22:24 +0200 as |
10 |
>>> excerpted: |
11 |
>>> |
12 |
>>>> solution: Treeclean it and maintain it in an overlay (maybe |
13 |
>>>> science-overlay). That's exactly what overlays are for... |
14 |
>>>> experimental stuff. |
15 |
>>> |
16 |
>>> What's the pros/cons of overlay vs. in-tree-but-masked for |
17 |
>>> something like this? In-tree-but-masked is at least available |
18 |
>>> for those who want it, without having to load an overlay, but I |
19 |
>>> don't see that discussed at all, here. |
20 |
>>> |
21 |
>> |
22 |
>> cons: - users have to run "layman -a foo" ...I hope they will |
23 |
>> manage (and the masking reason will be updated to explain where |
24 |
>> to look for googleearth ebuilds) |
25 |
> |
26 |
> Then to get *a single package* they start using the whole overlay. |
27 |
> If it's a sane overlay, fine. But some overlays really replace a |
28 |
> lot of stuff silently and trigger failures we didn't even imagine |
29 |
> before. |
30 |
> |
31 |
|
32 |
No. |
33 |
|
34 |
I'd either use a separate single-purpose overlay or add it to |
35 |
science-overlay. |
36 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
37 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) |
38 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ |
39 |
|
40 |
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJR7GI8AAoJEFpvPKfnPDWzVrQH/3o8FrgSaCFpWEAJj1qeFpQP |
41 |
/01wJzMsTV3YWZ9ZqvIZ7txPls+KBlV7hrm0SSNdP5SWO/tdXPllwNu7B+3rdcKN |
42 |
UOP56hlGtRRT2xw1/M/EWX76+hQmMUSYncMJ5kwqWwWGiKYRgJqR6WYH99igxwSV |
43 |
7OOewcdU9p56l1MY5TxyH0tG/7KkJADSmYCf6xIK7Lkz1yU9G/e2I1WQsMGVnIBR |
44 |
TUkV+q1gM9zDwjKtK64X4rA4l2KiTDfoksyBgSelVMYNPcNEGYZgwmrXCJhKZK7B |
45 |
dYONlBDp/9BG+ihhsNTAXewxsDuVPtXTdFX4dzLciXgGdFw81r+LoNFViH7pRVM= |
46 |
=4JPG |
47 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |