| 1 |
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 6:48 AM, Michael Palimaka <kensington@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 01/30/2014 02:37 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Here's a simple eclass that pretty much just extracts the XDG stuff from |
| 4 |
>> the gnome2_environment_reset function. |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> One difference: it creates 3 of the 4 directories under ${HOME} instead |
| 7 |
>> of ${T}, just to mimic the default behavior in the XDG basedir spec a |
| 8 |
>> bit more closely. |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> Please give a look. |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Hi, |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Thanks for working on this. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Two thoughts: |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> 1. Would it be worth consolidating this, fdo-mime.eclass, and some other |
| 20 |
> gnome2-utils stuff (eg. gnome2_icon_cache_update) into a larger |
| 21 |
> freedesktop eclass? |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
That sounds like a reasonable idea to me, but I'm not sure I'm the |
| 25 |
right person to make that call. I don't maintain many desktop |
| 26 |
packages. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
If some others chime in saying this would be desirable, I could |
| 29 |
certainly work on that. Ideally, I would like the freedesktop |
| 30 |
maintainers to agree on any/all functions that should be moved to the |
| 31 |
new eclass. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Otherwise, I will stick with the current xdg-basedir eclass and leave |
| 34 |
the consolidation work to someone else. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
> 2. xdg-basedir-setup -> xdg-basedir_setup is more consistent with other |
| 37 |
> modern eclasses, especially if there are additional functions in the future. |
| 38 |
> |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
Personally, I think that looks stupid. ^_^ Not something I'm going to |
| 41 |
fight over if it bothers people though. |
Archives