| 1 |
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 02:53:10AM -0500, Brian Harring wrote: |
| 2 |
> > |
| 3 |
> > Hell no. Don't need to add more confusion to the use flag confusion. |
| 4 |
> Instead, confuse the hell out of users who don't religiously follow |
| 5 |
> -dev/-user/-gwn, and suddenly get bit by the gtk flag losing it's |
| 6 |
> meaning? |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
i like doug's idea. gtk/gtk2 have a bit obsolete meaning. i bet there're |
| 9 |
plenty of users, who would like gtk2, but not gtk1 aplication on their |
| 10 |
systems. i don't think that leaving worse solution instead of making |
| 11 |
changes just becouse it's easier is good policy. |
| 12 |
about confusion: what about leaving 'gtk' flag for some time and make it |
| 13 |
the same meaning as 'gtk1'. additionaly - each ebuild, which make use of |
| 14 |
this flag could print some information, that it's obsolete and will be |
| 15 |
removed in near future |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~, |
| 20 |
Marcin 'aye' Kryczek ,.,.,.,., mail: aye%gentoo.pl .,.,. RLU: #316599 .,. / |
| 21 |
,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,., jid: aye%gentoo.pl ,., PGP: 0xD6CFCCF1 .,. / |
| 22 |
Key fingerprint = EE8F E832 54E4 2456 C582 5B32 E10F EEDC D6CF CCF1 .,. / |
| 23 |
~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~~~~~.,_/ |
Archives