| 1 |
Grant Goodyear wrote: |
| 2 |
> Curtis Napier wrote: [Mon Apr 10 2006, 11:21:14AM CDT] |
| 3 |
>> The redesign as it was known up until this point is no more. There were |
| 4 |
>> things the winner of the contest had to do and he failed to do them |
| 5 |
>> (after almost 2 years of trying to get him too). I discussed it with |
| 6 |
>> klieber a little and after much thought I have decided that the |
| 7 |
>> WWW-Redesign Contest is now officially dead and abandoned. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Thanks for the update. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> One question that your thorough response didn't answer (assuming that I |
| 12 |
> didn't miss it) is if you have plans to improve the site's navigation? |
| 13 |
> My understanding during the original redesign contest was that the |
| 14 |
> majority of the complaints we received about our site from users was the |
| 15 |
> difficulty involved in finding things. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> In any event, I think we need to remove the flying saucer guy. When |
| 18 |
> drobbins left and turned over the Gentoo IP to us, one thing that he |
| 19 |
> kept was the flying saucer guy. I believe that he was allowing us to |
| 20 |
> use it while we got the redesign put together, but since that's dead it |
| 21 |
> seems unfair to hold on to that flying saucer guy indefinitely. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> -g2boojum- |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
That's what this whole thread is about... a new theme. Specifically for |
| 27 |
the CD's but I am jumping on the bandwagon and going along for the ride. |
| 28 |
Hopefully something good will come of this, if not then I'll figure |
| 29 |
something out. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
For now just suffice it to say that a new theme that takes into |
| 32 |
consideration all the things you said above (and more) is going to |
| 33 |
happen one way or another. |
Archives