Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GCC 3.4 and ~x86
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 19:12:20
Message-Id: 200409132112.16961.pauldv@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] GCC 3.4 and ~x86 by Robert Moss
1 On Sunday 12 September 2004 02:24, Robert Moss wrote:
2 > If you're bothered, check out OpenOffice 1.9.52. That builds fine. Don't
3 > forget, every GCC 3.x for new x hasn't compiled OpenOffice when it went
4 > to ~x86. 3.3 hit and 3.2 was needed. 3.2 hit and it didn't compile at
5 > all. 3.1 was pre-OOo I think. We're not doing anything out of the ordinary.
6 >
7 > However, I'd be inclined to suggest that perhaps a 1.9.52 OOo ebuild,
8 > package.mask'd and -* keyworded, should perhaps be committed for testing
9 > purposes. Any objections? If not, I'll make the tarball and ebuild - it
10 > works here but my ebuild is filthy. Also when 2.0 is released the 64-bit
11 > fixes will be merged too.
12
13 If you could post them on bugzilla (not the tarball of course, but a link)
14 that would be nice. Assign them to openoffice@g.o
15
16 Paul
17
18 --
19 Paul de Vrieze
20 Gentoo Developer
21 Mail: pauldv@g.o
22 Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net