1 |
Hi Arch Teams, |
2 |
|
3 |
As previously announced[1], the Council has established a working group |
4 |
to evaluate the stable tree, and produce a report with a summary of the |
5 |
discussions held and a list of recommendations. |
6 |
|
7 |
As an arch team member, you have the best insight into current and best |
8 |
practices. We therefore hope you will kindly share some information with us: |
9 |
|
10 |
* Which architecture(s) do you work on? |
11 |
* Which types of packages do you work on? (eg. everything, only system, |
12 |
only security bugs, only keyword requests...) |
13 |
* How do you feel about the current state of your architecture(s) in |
14 |
general, and how does that compare to your ideal state? |
15 |
* What do you feel is the best practice for stabilising a given class of |
16 |
package? (eg. a core toolchain package vs. a common library vs. a random |
17 |
application with no revdeps) |
18 |
* How do you typically stabilise a package? |
19 |
|
20 |
We appreciate anything you care to share, and individual responses will |
21 |
not be shared outside of the working group (but may be summarised or |
22 |
paraphrased for our report). Our email address is wg-stable@g.o, |
23 |
please include this in To or CC of any response. |
24 |
|
25 |
1: |
26 |
https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev-announce/message/313ac9e95f384de7da7393cb40950d11 |