| 1 |
On 07/04/2018 12:54 PM, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
> W dniu śro, 04.07.2018 o godzinie 12∶35 +0200, użytkownik Kristian |
| 3 |
> Fiskerstrand napisał: |
| 4 |
>> On 07/04/2018 12:23 PM, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 5 |
>>> -2. Root key and signing subkey of EITHER: |
| 6 |
>>> +2. Root key and a dedicated signing subkey, both of EITHER: |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> "dedicated" here might be misread to be gentoo-specific, which doesn't |
| 9 |
>> really make much sense. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> What alternative do you suggest? We really want to make clear that we |
| 12 |
> require a separate subkey, and that subkey is not marked for encryption. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
"signing subkey" already implies as much though, but maybe write it out |
| 16 |
more "Both the primary key and the signing subkey needs to be of EITHER;" |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Kristian Fiskerstrand |
| 20 |
OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net |
| 21 |
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3 |
Archives